by Znethru
@ 27. 03. 08 - 00:13:53
pairs (all else of no importance), you are in 4th
AQ42
KJ82
J854
10
2S (weak) X P ?
If time permits, discuss the merits and demerits of the various choices!
Your bid, Ernesto
Trackback address for this post:
Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments
A good problem with 6 possible options:-
1. Pass. I'd only consider leaving the double in if we were at favourable.
2. 2NT. I can't bid this naturally playing Lebensohl and even if I could do I don't think it's right with 4 cards in the unbid major.
3. 3H constructive playing Lebensohl (about 8-11 HCPs). This would be my choice. Possibly a slight underbid due to the useful singleton club - but on the downside, the SQ may not be pulling its weight if we declare the hand in a suit contract. If partner continues w/ 3S asking for more info. I will suggest playing in NT.
4. 3S. For what purpose?
5. 3NT. This seems too unilateral.
6. 4H. Ditto 5 above.
 | Znethru pro http://www.febland.net/ 28/06/08 @ 00:38 |
I don't think I've answered this one yet! Well done! 3H is the correct choice - my pd plumped for 4H (-1 on a bad trump split).
Leave a comment :
Recent Posts
-
2-4 in the majors.
on 24. 08. 08 -
Transfer or Pass?
on 24. 08. 08 -
Lightner (or not?)
on 16. 08. 08 -
Consider the following bids!
on 16. 08. 08 -
An off-beat hand
on 30. 07. 08 -
W Midlands Duplicate 29.7.08
on 30. 07. 08 -
OK let's turn the tables!
on 26. 07. 08 -
Can you find the most sensible next bid!
on 26. 07. 08 -
X or Pass?
on 22. 07. 08 -
High-level decision
on 07. 05. 08
28/03/08 @ 16:46