Search blog.co.uk

High-level decision

by Znethru @ 07. 05. 08 - 15:57:54

You deal yourself a 3 count and Pass, game all, pairs, mid- div 2 level oppo., not shooting.

Q64
J432
876
987

P P 1D 1S; P 3S 4H 4S; ?

Pass, Double and 5H all spring to mind, with a possible 5D open for the left-field contingent!

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

gpcovegpcove [Member]
07/05/08 @ 22:44

Can you re-read the auction please.

Sorry about that. Have another go!

gpcovegpcove [Member]
08/05/08 @ 08:56

Pass.

I know I have 4 card support, but I have a flat working 1-count and the vulnerability doesn't suggest bidding.

If partner can't open with a strong bid, then even his very shapely 2-suiter will need some help with the missing honours and I doubt my Jack is helping too much. I can see us losing 2 (or opposite H, 3) side suit tricks and at least 2 in the reds. Too expensive.

Simon Mostyn [Visitor]

13/05/08 @ 09:25

5D (paper tiger!)

I am taking partner for at least 5-6 in the red suits (good players don't generally introduce a 4 card suit at the 4 level).

I prefer to play in pd's longer suit as I expect pd to be forced repeatedly.

I seem to recall bidding 5H which H played for 4-off undoubled -400.

One of the keys to the hand is remembering that however good partner is, he didn't open with a strong two.

gpcovegpcove [Member]
13/05/08 @ 14:04

If partner can't open with a strong bid, then even his very shapely 2-suiter will need some help with the missing honours and I doubt my Jack is helping too much.

;)

Simon Mostyn [Visitor]

13/05/08 @ 12:38

True, but players sometimes prefer to open strong 2-suiters at the 1 level to allow more bidding space.

If you play 2D as 8 PTs in any suit, then with a strong 2-suiter hand with diamonds any any other suit, you're at the 4 level b4 you're able to introduce the 2nd suit.

I agree with you. This wasn't meant to be an easy hand though!

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Recent Posts

  1. 2-4 in the majors.
    by Znethru pro on 24. 08. 08
  2. Transfer or Pass?
    by Znethru pro on 24. 08. 08
  3. Lightner (or not?)
    by Znethru pro on 16. 08. 08
  4. Consider the following bids!
    by Znethru pro on 16. 08. 08
  5. An off-beat hand
    by Znethru pro on 30. 07. 08
  6. W Midlands Duplicate 29.7.08
    by Znethru pro on 30. 07. 08
  7. OK let's turn the tables!
    by Znethru pro on 26. 07. 08
  8. Can you find the most sensible next bid!
    by Znethru pro on 26. 07. 08
  9. X or Pass?
    by Znethru pro on 22. 07. 08
  10. Late intrusion
    by Znethru pro on 07. 05. 08

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.