Search blog.co.uk

Can you find the most sensible next bid!

by Znethru @ 26. 07. 08 - 11:14:16

Pairs, Love all, 3rd in hand, av+ oppo

A9
KQ3
QJ62
K982

P P 1C 3S; X P ?

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

gpcovegpcove [Member]
26/07/08 @ 11:30

3NT hugely tempting and I think I'd go for this with Axx in spades, but with Ax only I'm slightly reluctant.

So, I'll Pass (there's a surprise).

Hi Gary, I will give more details of this hand later on. H & I discussed the merits of opening this hand 1NT in view of the 4-4 shape in the minors. What are your views on this?

gpcovegpcove [Member]
26/07/08 @ 21:32

You mean as a 12-14 NT opener? If so, I can understand wanting to pre-empt the minors, but you do have a solid 15 count.

It's swings and roundabouts. Opposite a passed hand, the odds of game are slim so I'm not too worried there.

However, you will be a red rag to a bull and the oppo are likely to come in over your 1NT. So now, everybody is in the dark. You might have a 9 card minor fit and end up having to defend against a 5-2 (or 5-3) major fit that comes in at the 2-level. Equally, the oppo might be a level too high in a hand where you can't make anything.

So if you want to create a swing hand or your playing against fairly weak opposition, I'd say 1NT is fine. Otherwise I think you should just play down the line.

Good question.

Simon Mostyn [Visitor]

26/07/08 @ 21:19

Pass. Pre-empts work! With a meagre S stopper, I don't fancy our prospects of running 9 tricks opposite a passed hand and so will play for +300/500. I would be more likely to bid 3N opposite an unpassed hand.

BTW, I see no reason to downgrade this hand (assuming your 1NT opening is 12-14).

I bid 4D and H 'corrected' to 5C which sailed two off.

The problem lay with H's neg X as seen in the problem directly above this one on the page.

3NT happens to be the winning action, but I don't see how I can bid it with any great confidence here! 3S (by them, doubled or undoubled) also makes incidentally!

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Recent Posts

  1. 2-4 in the majors.
    by Znethru pro on 24. 08. 08
  2. Transfer or Pass?
    by Znethru pro on 24. 08. 08
  3. Lightner (or not?)
    by Znethru pro on 16. 08. 08
  4. Consider the following bids!
    by Znethru pro on 16. 08. 08
  5. An off-beat hand
    by Znethru pro on 30. 07. 08
  6. W Midlands Duplicate 29.7.08
    by Znethru pro on 30. 07. 08
  7. OK let's turn the tables!
    by Znethru pro on 26. 07. 08
  8. X or Pass?
    by Znethru pro on 22. 07. 08
  9. High-level decision
    by Znethru pro on 07. 05. 08
  10. Late intrusion
    by Znethru pro on 07. 05. 08

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.