<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-11-21:/</id><title>Close Calls</title><link rel="self" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/"/><subtitle>Bridge - now an Olympic Sport.</subtitle><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-21T07:12:08+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-07-27:/2009/07/25/find-a-good-response-here-6585386/#c10519316</id><title>In response to:Find a good response here</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2009/07/25/find-a-good-response-here-6585386/#c10519316"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2009-07-27T00:52:23+02:00</published><updated>2009-07-27T00:52:23+02:00</updated><content type="html">I suppose my partner was frightened of a 4S bid over 3S, so he psyched 1S as a waiting bid. This led to the rather clunky auction Pass 4S (I was almost good enough to bid 4D as a splinter) Pass 5H float when 7H is cold but only 50% (6H+1 was a joint top).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1H X 1S - &lt;br&gt;
4S - 5H</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-07-26:/2009/07/25/find-a-good-response-here-6585386/#c10519130</id><title>In response to:Find a good response here</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2009/07/25/find-a-good-response-here-6585386/#c10519130"/><author><name>gpcove</name></author><published>2009-07-26T23:46:41+02:00</published><updated>2009-07-26T23:46:41+02:00</updated><content type="html">3S splinter.  What's the problem or am I missing something blindingly obvious again?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-05-14:/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9905520</id><title>In response to:Would you ever consider opening this hand 1D?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9905520"/><author><name>Simon Mostyn</name></author><published>2009-05-14T15:22:41+02:00</published><updated>2009-05-14T15:22:41+02:00</updated><content type="html">This is a 1C opener for me too for the sensible reasons stated above.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Regards.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Simon</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-05-13:/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9893989</id><title>In response to:Would you ever consider opening this hand 1D?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9893989"/><author><name>Gary Cove</name></author><published>2009-05-13T10:56:15+02:00</published><updated>2009-05-13T10:56:15+02:00</updated><content type="html">OK.  No, never.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm not sure I'd reverse but I'd certainly be happy to make several noises on the hand, in what is likely to be a competitive auction (both with partner and oppo).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why would I want to show 5+D and 4+C when I'm actually 5-6?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-05-11:/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9881823</id><title>In response to:Would you ever consider opening this hand 1D?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9881823"/><author><name>Gary Cove</name></author><published>2009-05-11T23:19:44+02:00</published><updated>2009-05-11T23:19:44+02:00</updated><content type="html">Not on a Friday at Pinner.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-05-07:/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9843795</id><title>In response to:Would you ever consider opening this hand 1D?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9843795"/><author><name>Paul Littlewood</name></author><published>2009-05-07T14:19:57+02:00</published><updated>2009-05-07T14:19:57+02:00</updated><content type="html">Personally I would not as it is too much of a distortion because I have longer and stronger clubs. I will also not be ashamed of reversing with such a powerful playing trick hand.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2009-05-06:/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9838099</id><title>In response to:Would you ever consider opening this hand 1D?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2009/05/06/would-you-ever-consider-opening-this-hand-1d-6071412/#c9838099"/><author><name>SeasideMan</name></author><published>2009-05-06T20:41:58+02:00</published><updated>2009-05-06T20:41:58+02:00</updated><content type="html">No...</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-27:/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8385065</id><title>In response to:2-parter</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8385065"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-27T11:56:52+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-27T11:56:52+01:00</updated><content type="html">Simon you've scored 100% - Harry found a 4D bid 4NT from me would now be a sign off.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Unfortunately, on this occasion, it was me who screwed up!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I read H's initial 3D bid as super-weak. He hesitated for a good minute + before pulling out 4D and I couldn't believe it was a slam try - I thought he was "pulling" 3NT.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I then proceeded to 'get out' with 5D (equally, I could have tried 4NT to play).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Oddly enough there was an equally bad screw up in the other room.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dhondy J. chose 3H 4SF on the hand where you've found the nice 3D bid and simply passed Heather's 3NT call.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think this was meant to be a division one match!!!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-27:/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8385026</id><title>In response to:2-parter</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8385026"/><author><name>Simon Mostyn</name></author><published>2008-11-27T11:51:51+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-27T11:51:51+01:00</updated><content type="html">I'll show some mild encouragement and genuine diamonds with 4D.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(My original 3D doesn't guarantee much in the way of D support - could have been false preference with something like&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
AKxxx&lt;br&gt;
xxx&lt;br&gt;
xx&lt;br&gt;
xxx&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
so it's important to show real diamonds now.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Interesting aside - do you and H play that having bid 3NT to play, 4NT over 4D now would be a suggestion of a place to play rather than RKBC?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
S</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-27:/2008/11/26/one-to-be-wary-of-5112700/#c8384833</id><title>In response to:One to be wary of</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/26/one-to-be-wary-of-5112700/#c8384833"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-27T11:29:00+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-27T11:29:00+01:00</updated><content type="html">I am assuming (but do not know for an absolute fact) that there was no t.o. double on the other table - the doubler actually only held 3 Spades.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So, it probably went 1H - 1S; 2D - 2S; float which probably came in for 8 tricks. (Mind you, this is a guess).</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-27:/2008/11/26/one-to-be-wary-of-5112700/#c8384789</id><title>In response to:One to be wary of</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/26/one-to-be-wary-of-5112700/#c8384789"/><author><name>Simon Mostyn</name></author><published>2008-11-27T11:23:55+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-27T11:23:55+01:00</updated><content type="html">Do you know how the bidding went at the other table Jonathan?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
S</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-27:/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8384782</id><title>In response to:2-parter</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8384782"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-27T11:22:50+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-27T11:22:50+01:00</updated><content type="html">Your partner responds 3NT do you follow up with anything?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-27:/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8384755</id><title>In response to:2-parter</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/26/2-parter-5112658/#c8384755"/><author><name>Simon Mostyn</name></author><published>2008-11-27T11:19:43+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-27T11:19:43+01:00</updated><content type="html">Easy for now - a simple 3D. We are in a GF situation. Maybe I am missing the point?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
S</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-12:/2008/09/20/would-you-ever-come-in-with-this-hand-4753271/#c8245154</id><title>In response to:Would you ever come in with this hand?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/09/20/would-you-ever-come-in-with-this-hand-4753271/#c8245154"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-12T14:00:21+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T14:00:21+01:00</updated><content type="html">Nearly everyone was bidding at equal vul. on this one and they all did well as pd showed up with AS &amp; other misc. and amazingly, 10 tricks were available.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Harry passed and we got about a 16% board!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-12:/2008/10/21/pass-or-3s-and-why-4904214/#c8245130</id><title>In response to:Pass or 3S and why?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/10/21/pass-or-3s-and-why-4904214/#c8245130"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-12T13:58:25+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T13:58:25+01:00</updated><content type="html">I chose 3S here. I was doubled and went 2 off with a further loss of a few IMPs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't think this is at all an easy hand and might well do the same again given the same cards again. Harry was very light for his 2S bid.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-12:/2008/10/21/pass-or-re-opening-x-4904218/#c8245106</id><title>In response to:Pass or re-opening X?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/10/21/pass-or-re-opening-x-4904218/#c8245106"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-12T13:56:37+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T13:56:37+01:00</updated><content type="html">Pass is correct here. X is far too aggressive at Game all playing teams against another div one side. We ended up going one off in 4C undoubled on this occasion and lost a handful of IMPs.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-12:/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8245079</id><title>In response to:Quick choices</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8245079"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-12T13:54:27+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-12T13:54:27+01:00</updated><content type="html">On #1 I chose 2C pd (Jacqui Tobias) much preferred 2S here. Result, we played in 2S+2 although with perfect defence it can be held to 9 tricks. A few pairs reached a making game and we got about a 38% board. I think we are only ever going to play in 3S though!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On #2 I picked the poor bid of "Pass" greedily pinching the hand as I fancied my own declarer play! As it happens we can only make 9 tricks in Hearts in a 5-3 (8 tricks were scrambled in a 4-3 Club fit). We actually (somehow) gained 5 IMPs on this board (presumably they were in 4H-1 next door). In any case, lesson learnt. The bid is a resounding 2H.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-10:/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8222653</id><title>In response to:Quick choices</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8222653"/><author><name>Simon Mostyn</name></author><published>2008-11-10T09:48:00+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-10T09:48:00+01:00</updated><content type="html">Good morning Jonathan,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. 2S. If partner has 5 spades and is too weak to bid again, I will have done the right thing. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Alternatively, if partner only has 4 spades, then a competitive bidding consideration comes into play as follows:- &lt;br&gt;
If partner has only 4 spades then it follows that he doesn't have 4+ hearts (he would have responded 1H) so we the oppo must have a 9+ card heart fit. 2S makes it harder for them to find this than 2C.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2. I can't disagree with Paul's answer on this one but the only time I would have opened that hand 1C would be in the context of a weak NT 5 card major system. (else I would either open a strong NT or 1S if playing ACOL weak NT).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Regards.&lt;br&gt;
Simon</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-09:/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8214585</id><title>In response to:Quick choices</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8214585"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-11-09T12:06:58+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-09T12:06:58+01:00</updated><content type="html">Interesting answers. Many thanks.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-11-09:/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8214556</id><title>In response to:Quick choices</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/11/09/quick-choices-5006906/#c8214556"/><author><name>Paul Littlewood</name></author><published>2008-11-09T12:04:46+01:00</published><updated>2008-11-09T12:04:46+01:00</updated><content type="html">On 1/ I prefer 2C because I have no honour in Spades&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On 2/ I would bid 2H because my hand is quite good and it is conceivable that we could be missing game if partner holds for example :&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
xx / KJxxx / xxx / KQx&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
He will now bid 3H and the game will be reached.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Cheers,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Paul</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-10-21:/2008/10/21/pass-or-re-opening-x-4904218/#c8050888</id><title>In response to:Pass or re-opening X?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/10/21/pass-or-re-opening-x-4904218/#c8050888"/><author><name>Simon Mostyn</name></author><published>2008-10-21T09:12:06+02:00</published><updated>2008-10-21T09:12:06+02:00</updated><content type="html">Pass (but close to a 2nd double). I know my inaction could very easily lose a part-score swing but vulnerable oppo won't bid to 3H on tram tickets. If we are going to be playing the hand, I also have the worst possible heart holding for partner.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't think we have a game on - the fact partner hasn't bid freely over 3H leads me to think that he either doesn't have 4 spades or if he does he has no extras.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-10-21:/2008/10/21/pass-or-3s-and-why-4904214/#c8050834</id><title>In response to:Pass or 3S and why?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/10/21/pass-or-3s-and-why-4904214/#c8050834"/><author><name>Simon Mostyn</name></author><published>2008-10-21T09:05:43+02:00</published><updated>2008-10-21T09:05:43+02:00</updated><content type="html">Pass. For 3 reasons:-&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Law of Total Tricks - there's nothing to suggest that we have a 9 card fit (if we do I expect pd to compete further) and bidding 3 over 3 only right if one side has a 9 card fit.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2. I'd be delighted to defend 3H (dream on!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3. The fact that opener has extras and pd could be very weak for his single raise leads me to think 3S could be whacked and go for 300.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-22:/2008/09/20/would-you-ever-come-in-with-this-hand-4753271/#c7814690</id><title>In response to:Would you ever come in with this hand?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/09/20/would-you-ever-come-in-with-this-hand-4753271/#c7814690"/><author><name>gpcove</name></author><published>2008-09-22T20:32:15+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-22T20:32:15+02:00</updated><content type="html">OK at favourable I suppose.  Should be good for 6 tricks, -500 against (presumably -600+).  Any intervention could screw up their auction a bit.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I've no problem with any partner that passes though.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-18:/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7783922</id><title>In response to:Puzzle in Diamonds</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7783922"/><author><name>gpcove</name></author><published>2008-09-18T20:27:20+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-18T20:27:20+02:00</updated><content type="html">I'm playing pairs so I think my choices are 3NT.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We don't have a spade fit and I have stops in the other 2 suits.  5D is unlikely to be better and I don't see anyway to investiage 6D without potentially losing a bundle of MP's.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Looking at both hands I'm guessing that 6D makes and was probably bid somewhere although it doesn't look a great contract to me (I'm not clever enough to work out the odds but I would guess they're well under 50%).</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-18:/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7783422</id><title>In response to:Puzzle in Diamonds</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7783422"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-09-18T19:34:36+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-18T19:34:36+02:00</updated><content type="html">OK - here is part two of the bridge puzzle (as far as I am concerned, you got part one right!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
6&lt;br&gt;
A105&lt;br&gt;
K8652&lt;br&gt;
A873&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1S P 2D P; 3D P ?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What are the choices here &amp; which would you plump for?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-17:/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7772134</id><title>In response to:Puzzle in Diamonds</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7772134"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-09-17T13:35:18+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-17T13:35:18+02:00</updated><content type="html">Thanks for your answer! I will let you have a 'part 2' to this question in another 48 hours or so!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-17:/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7772071</id><title>In response to:Puzzle in Diamonds</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/09/16/puzzle-in-diamonds-4738023/#c7772071"/><author><name>gpcove</name></author><published>2008-09-17T13:25:37+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-17T13:25:37+02:00</updated><content type="html">3D.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm fairly big but a quarter of my points are in the doubletons and I've no idea if we have even a partial spade fit.  Also, 2D could be short if I'm playing a stupid system.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If partner bids 3H I'll plump for 3NT.  If he bids 3S I'll bid 4S.  If he bids 3NT I'll Pass.  If he bids 4D I'll tank and probably Pass.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-13:/2008/08/15/consider-the-following-bids-4594679/#c7738930</id><title>In response to:Consider the following bids!</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/08/15/consider-the-following-bids-4594679/#c7738930"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-09-13T09:49:10+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-13T09:49:10+02:00</updated><content type="html">I bid 1NT which led to a small av+&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think I really only published this hand because it's rare to be faced with so many possible choices for the first bid as responder!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-13:/2008/08/16/lightner-or-not-4594724/#c7738911</id><title>In response to:Lightner (or not?)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/08/16/lightner-or-not-4594724/#c7738911"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-09-13T09:45:54+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-13T09:45:54+02:00</updated><content type="html">On the second hand, again 6D is a good bid. I passed and instead of leading the singleton H which might have worked if declarer ruffs small in hand at trick 2. I 'read' the double as another Lightner double and lead a Club which chucked it at them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2 disasters in 2 hands and a further learning curve!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:znethru-3.blog.co.uk,2008-09-13:/2008/08/16/lightner-or-not-4594724/#c7738884</id><title>In response to:Lightner (or not?)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://znethru-3.blog.co.uk/2008/08/16/lightner-or-not-4594724/#c7738884"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2008-09-13T09:42:23+02:00</published><updated>2008-09-13T09:42:23+02:00</updated><content type="html">Just to confirm your answer was spot on here.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I got everything wrong on this hand! 4C bid - wrong, pushed them into diamonds! Choice of lead - wrong, I lead QS and they romped home. It has to be a heart to score the ruff.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Quite a bit of stuff learnt right here on one hand!</content></entry></feed>
